2025학년도 수능특강 데스트 편 Test 1 무관한 문장, 글의 순서, 끼워넣기, 요약, 장문 1 문제들을 Keywords, phrases, clauses, sentences을 찾은 후 문제풀이를 하겠습니다.
긴 문장은 구와 절 덩어리로 묶고 독해하기 편한 문장으로 보면 독해가 편해진다.
< 구: 두 단어 이상 > [ 절: 접주동 ]
구안에 절이 들어갈 수 도 절안에 구가 들어갈 수도 있다. 덩어리를 잘 묶어 보면 문장이 어렵지 않게 보이기 시작한다.
< 명사구 > [ 명사절 ] < 형용사구 > [ 형용사절 ] < 부사구 > [ 부사절 ]
고딕체만 보면 답이 보인다
2024년 서울대 진학률이 높은 고등학교 전국 37개 학교
2024년 서울대 진학률이 높은 전국 37개 학교에 대해 알아보겠습니다. 학교명 지역 고교유형 수시 정시 인원 용인외대부고 용인 전국자사고 28 38 66 대원외고 광진구 외고 24 21 45 중동고 강남 광역
jb-club.kr
[문제] 18 다음 글에서 전체 흐름과 관계 없는 문장은?
Your children establish their social comfort and skills early in their lives by observing you in your own social life and through the social experiences [they have]. ① These first social experiences become the defaults that will guide and shape the quality and quantity of their relationships throughout their lives. ② Genetics clearly has an influence on these defaults; research has demonstrated that children are born with a certain temperament, including where they lie on the continuum of introversion to extraversion. ③ But, as the saying goes, “genetics are not destiny”; the messages that your children get from you early in their lives about how they should interact with others will influence how their genetic predispositions will be expressed. ④ [What children do [as they, for example, watch television or movies or play video games or surf the Internet],] has no direct consequences on their lives or the lives of others. ⑤ In this interaction of genes and upbringing, your children will develop social defaults that trigger social ease, connectedness, and healthy relationships, or social anxiety, loneliness, and dysfunctional relationships.
* default: 기본 값 ** temperament: 기질 *** introversion: 내향성
[문제] 19 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것은?
[When different cultures meet], <whether at the societal level or in the company>, ideas <about [how things should be done]> often clash. To resolve it, we typically make the assumption [that others should change to be more like us].
(A) So when you ask people to do something not consistent with their cultural background, ask yourself whether you should be rethinking your assumptions about what works best. For example, free-flowing talk is usually considered the hallmark of a good meeting. Everybody just jumps in whenever they have a thought.
(B) And we can enforce this view because we are in power — either as the boss in an organization or as the dominant culture in a country. But assuming that the dominant person or country has the right rules and the right way is, in itself, anathema to innovating. Self-satisfied people are not good innovators.
(C) However, in some cultures, this is considered rude and pushy, so some people with excellent ideas may not speak up. One solution might be to strengthen their group skills but other methods are to occasionally ask everyone to express an opinion in turn, ask for ideas in writing, or table an idea on someone else’s behalf.
* hallmark: 특징 ** anathema: 아주 싫어하는 것
① (A) - (C) - (B) ② (B) - (A) - (C) ③ (B) - (C) - (A)
④ (C) - (A) - (B) ⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)
[문제] 주어진 글 다음에 이어질 글의 순서로 가장 적절한 것은?
Like some strange alien creature extending tentacles, each neuron is simultaneously connected to up to thousands of other neurons. It is the combined activity of information <coming in> [that determines [whether a neuron is active or not]].
(A) And every time the neuron has such a conversation with its different neighbors or long-distance pals, it remembers the message either to spread the word or be silent, so that when the rumor comes round again, the neuron responds with more certainty. This is because the connections between the neurons have become strengthened by repeatedly firing together.
(B) [When the sum of this activity reaches a tipping point], the neuron fires, discharging a small chemical electrical signal and setting off a chain reaction in its connections. In effect, each neuron is a bit like a microprocessor because it computes the combined activity of all the other neurons it is connected to.
(C) It’s a bit like spreading a rumor in a neighborhood. Some of your neighboring neurons are excitatory and, like good friends, want to help spread the word. Other neurons are inhibitory and basically tell you to shut up.
* tentacle: 촉수 ** pal: 친구 *** tipping point: 급변점(극적인 변화의 시작점)
① (A) - (C) - (B) ② (B) - (A) - (C) ③ (B) - (C) - (A)
④ (C) - (A) - (B) ⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)
[문제] 21 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳은?
The cook and kitchen are approximately the same after making the pizza as before, [though just a bit more worn out].
Conventional economics uses the phrase “factors of production.” Factors of production are the inputs into a production process necessary to create any output. For example, when you make a pizza, you need a cook, a kitchen with an oven, and the raw ingredients. ( ① ) If you think about it carefully, however, you will clearly see that the cook and kitchen are different in some fundamental ways from the raw ingredients. ( ② ) The raw ingredients, however, are used up, transformed first into the pizza itself, then rapidly thereafter into waste. ( ③ ) The cook and kitchen are not physically embodied in the pizza, but the raw ingredients are. ( ④ ) Thousands of years ago, Aristotle discussed this important distinction and divided causation (factors) into material cause, that which is transformed, and efficient cause, that which causes the transformation without itself being transformed in the process. ( ⑤ ) Raw ingredients are the material cause, and the cook and kitchen are the efficient cause.
* embody: 담다, 구현하다
[문제] 22 글의 흐름으로 보아, 주어진 문장이 들어가기에 가장 적절한 곳은?
In the United States, the cost of educating children is borne collectively through the system of public education, but most other costs of raising children are treated as private costs of the parents.
A society needs to raise children to replace its members who die, or the society would disappear over a couple of generations. ( ① ) One could, therefore, think of the production of children as a positive externality. ( ② ) Those who do not have children benefit from the child-rearing labors of those who do; they enjoy a society of varied ages in which to live as they grow older, and a labor force of younger people is available to support them in their retirement. ( ③ ) Should all then share in the economic costs of raising the children? ( ④ ) In about half of the world’s states, however, the full society assumes some of the responsibility for all costs of child rearing by giving direct grants to families with children. ( ⑤ ) These grants are often pegged to the median income of workers in the country: the government might give 10 percent of the country’s median income to any family with two children, for example.
* positive externality: 긍정적인 외부 효과(경제적 거래의 결과로 제삼자가 누리는 이익)
** peg: (가격이나 임금 등의 수준을) 정하다
[문제] 23 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?
Primates are capable of sophisticated forms of reasoning in naturalistic settings, especially when their food — or position in the social hierarchy — is in danger. However, it is unclear how versatile their relational reasoning might be. In the 1940s, the primatologist Harry Harlow made an interesting discovery. In a series of experiments, monkeys learnt to choose between two visual objects, one of which was rewarded and one was not. Harlow noted with surprise that each time the task was restarted with two entirely novel objects, the monkeys learnt slightly faster. In fact, their performance continued to accelerate over hundreds of new object sets, until eventually the monkeys could respond almost perfectly from the second trial onwards. Harlow argued that over the course of repeated pairings, the monkeys had learnt how to learn. It seems that the monkeys learnt something abstract about the relations between the two stimuli in each pairing — that if one was rewarded, the other was not. By generalizing this knowledge to new pairings, they could learn ever faster. Human children tested in a comparable fashion showed the same ability.
* primate: 영장류 ** hierarchy: 위계, 계층 *** versatile: 다방면적인
↓
Harry Harlow’s experiments show [that primates, like humans, can (A) abstract relational reasoning in a different context, [which happens faster with (B) exposure to stimuli]].
(A) (B) (A) (B)
① accept occasional ② acquire brief
③ apply increased ④ explain regular
⑤ reject repetitive
[24~25] [지문] 다음 글을 읽고, 물음에 답하시오.
In the 1930s, the English psychologist Sir Frederic Bartlett proposed [that we gradually build up our knowledge of the world from events [we experience]], and [that these experiences are then clustered in organized mental structures [he called “schemata.”]] In turn, these schemata (or “schemas”) are used to help us understand new experiences and form frameworks in which to remember them. One potential (a) downside of this arrangement is that it is relatively difficult for us to understand and remember information and events that do not fit our current schemata. One of Bartlett’s classic demonstrations was to present an unusual North American folktale to an English university student to learn and recall. The student’s written recall differed from the (b) original by being shorter and omitting a number of details. This first student’s written recall was then given to a second student to learn and recall with the result that more unusual details were dropped out of his reproduction, but other details were added, apparently to make the story (c) more coherent and comprehensible to English ears. This procedure was repeated until a series of ten students had learned the previous reproduction and produced their own versions. By the end of the series, the reproductions were much shorter, the supernatural details in the original had been (d) lost , and the whole tale was closer to the experience of English university students in the 1930s. This demonstration thus illustrates the constructive nature of remembering, and the effects of beliefs and attitudes on recollection and understanding. Gossip serves as a commonplace example that is (e) counter to Bartlett’s findings, with a story progressively changing as it travels across tellings. To return to metaphors for a moment, human memory is not like a tape recorder!
* schema: 스키마(정보를 통합하고 조직화하는 인지적 개념 또는 틀) (pl. schemata) ** coherent:일관된
*** metaphor: 은유
[문제] 24 윗글의 제목으로 가장 적절한 것은?
① How Prior Knowledge Impacts Memory
② How Gossip Affects Personal Relationships
③ The Need for New Experiences for Storytelling
④ What You Should Do to Improve Your Memory
⑤ Why Your Experience Matters in Making Up a Story
[문제] 25 밑줄 친 (a)∼(e) 중에서 문맥상 낱말의 쓰임이 적절하지 않은 것은?
① (a) ② (b) ③ (c) ④ (d) ⑤ (e)